Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 2000-104
Original file (2000-104.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 
Application for the Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 
 
                                                                                BCMR Docket No. 2000-104 
 
 
   

FINAL DECISION 

 
ANDREWS, Attorney-Advisor: 
 
 
This  proceeding  was  conducted  under  the  provisions  of  section  1552  of 
title 10 and section 425 of title 14 of the United States Code.  It was docketed on 
March  27,  2000,  when  the  application  was  completed  by  the  receipt  of  the 
applicant’s military records. 
 
 
appointed members who were designated to serve as the Board in this case. 
 

This  final  decision,  dated  January  4,  2001,  is  signed  by  the  three  duly 

APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS 

 

 
 

 

The  applicant,  a  xxxxxxxx  in  the  Coast  Guard  who  retired  on  xxxxxxx 
1999, asked the Board to correct block 13 on his discharge form DD 214 to show 
that he received a Meritorious Service Medal.  He also asked the Board to correct 
block  14  to  show  that  he  attended  two  educational  programs  while  on  active 
duty:  “Covey  Training  Seven  Habits  of  Highly  Effective  People”  and  “Covey 
Leadership  Training—Principle-Centered  Leadership.” 
  In  support  of  his 
application, he submitted a copy of the citation for the medal and copies of two 
certificates  from  the  Covey  Leadership  Center  indicating  that  he  successfully 
completed the courses.   
  

VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD 

 
 
On October 5, 2000, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard submitted an 
advisory  opinion  in  which  he  stated  that  the  Coast  Guard  had  granted  partial 
relief administratively by issuing a DD Form 215.  The form corrected the appli-

cant’s DD 214 to show that he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal.  He 
submitted a copy of the DD 215 showing the addition of the medal to block 13.  
 
The  Chief  Counsel  recommended  that  the  Board  deny  the  applicant’s 
 
request to add mention of the two Covey courses to block 14 of his DD 214.  He 
stated that under Chapter 1.E.14. of COMDTINST M1900.4D, only schools and 
training  courses  listed  in  Enclosure  8  of  the  Personnel,  Pay,  and  Procedures 
Manual may be cited on a DD 214 when successfully completed by a member.  
He stated that the list in Enclosure 8 does not include any courses offered by the 
Covey Leadership Center. 
 

 
The Board makes the following findings and conclusions on the basis of 
 
the applicant's military record and submissions, the Coast Guard's submissions, 
and applicable law: 
 

1. 

The Board has jurisdiction concerning this matter pursuant to sec-

tion 1552 of title 10 of the United States Code.  The application was timely. 
 

2. 

The Coast Guard has already granted part of the relief requested by 
the  applicant  by  correcting  his  DD  214  to  include  mention  of  his  Meritorious 

APPLICABLE LAWS 

 
Commandant Instruction M1900.4D governs the preparation of DD 214s.  
 
Under  Chapter  1.E.  of  the  instruction,  block  13  is  supposed  to  include  “all 
decorations,  medals,  badges,  commendations,  citations,  and  campaign  ribbons 
awarded  or  authorized  for  all  periods  of  service,”  as  well  as  Good  Conduct 
Awards, Purple Hearts, and Navy or Armed Forces Expeditionary Medals. 
 
 
Chapter 1.E. also provides that block 14, “Military Education,” of the DD 
214  shall  cite  “formal  service  schools  and  in-service  training  courses  in  [the 
Personnel, Pay, and Procedures Manual] …  successfully completed during the 
period  of  service  covered  by  the  form  …  e.g.,  medical  and  dental,  electronics, 
supply administration, personnel, or heavy equipment operations.”  
 
 
Enclosure 8 of the Personnel, Pay, and Procedures Manual lists thousands 
of training courses.  The Covey classes completed by the applicant are not listed.  
Also absent from the list are two of the fourteen classes that are cited in block 14 
of the applicant’s DD 214:  “Dale Carnegie Course Laboratory Class” and “Super-
visory Awareness of Sexual Harassment.” 
 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 

Service Medal.  Therefore, no further action is required by the Board with respect 
to the medal. 

The two Covey classes completed by the applicant do not appear 
on  the  list of  recognized  service  schools  and  training  courses  in  the  Personnel, 
Pay,  and  Procedures  Manual.    Under  Chapter  1.E.  of  COMDTINST  M1900.4D, 
only  courses  that  are  listed  in  the  manual  and  successfully  completed  by  the 
member should appear on a DD 214.  Therefore, the Coast Guard committed no 
error when it omitted mention of the Covey classes on the applicant’s DD 214. 

Although  block  14  on  the  applicant’s  DD  214  does  mention  two 
courses (“Dale Carnegie Course Laboratory Class” and “Supervisory Awareness 
of Sexual Harassment”) that are not listed in the Personnel, Pay, and Procedures 
Manual, this apparently erroneous inclusion does not prove that the exclusion of 
the Covey classes from block 14 was unjust. 

 Accordingly, the applicant’s request regarding the inclusion of two 

 
3. 

 
4. 

 
5. 

 
Covey classes in block 14 of his DD 214 should be denied. 
 
 
 
 
 

[ORDER AND SIGNATURES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE]

ORDER 

 

 

The  application  of  retired  XXXXXXXXX,  USCG,  for  correction  of  his 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

military record, is hereby denied. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

        

 
Stephen H. Barber 

 

 

 
Donna L. O'Berry 

 

 

 
Karen L. Petronis 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2010-017

    Original file (2010-017.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. On the applicant’s DD 214, block 4.a. The instructions in the manual state that, for enlisted personnel, block 11 should contain only the entry “NA.” The PSC pointed out that a member’s military education is properly shown in block 14 of a DD 214 and alleged that the applicant’s completion of 30 weeks of Electronics Technician School is...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-095

    Original file (2008-095.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because entering information in block 11 for an enlisted member would violate the regulation, CGPC recommended that the Board deny the applicant’s request. Enter all course titles, number of weeks, and year completed, from the date entered in block 12a through the date entered in block 12b. With the notation “NA” and many Xes, block 11 of the applicant’s DD 214 is properly prepared in accordance with Chapters 1.E.

  • CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2010-040

    Original file (2010-040.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    • • • On April 24, 1995, the applicant enlisted in the Coast Guard Reserve. of the Pay Manual, COMDTINST M7220.29B, states that creditable service for pay purposes includes “all periods of active duty inactive service … in any Regular or Reserve component.” However, Chapter 2.B.4.a. However, the 1995 RATMAN defines an “anniversary year” as extending “from the date of entry or reen- try to the day preceding the anniversary of entry or reentry” and the 1997 RPM states that a reservist’s...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2012-123

    Original file (2012-123.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    § 182(b) and (c)(1), a cadet who does not complete the course of instruction at the Coast Guard Academy may be transferred to the Reserve and “order[ed] to active duty for such period of time as the Secretary prescribes (but not to exceed four years).” Summary of Past Actions Month Sept. 2007 July 2009 June 2010 Feb. 2012 Action Enlisted for 6 years of active duty Discharged (DD 214) and reenlisted for 2 years Discharged (DD 214) and appointed a cadet Disenrolled, discharged (DD 214),...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2009-003

    Original file (2009-003.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CGPC noted that the application was submitted untimely and that the applicant “provided no justification for the delay in filing.” CGPC stated that the applicant’s request should be denied based on its untimeliness and lack of merit. CGPC stated that the work that the applicant was assigned, which he attributed to preju- dice, “is not inconsistent with work typically assigned to non-rated personnel or personnel of his pay grade.” CGPC also noted the applicant’s disciplinary problems while...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2011-090

    Original file (2011-090.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated December 22, 2011, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to upgrade his February 14, 2008, general discharge under honorable conditions to an honorable discharge; to upgrade his separation code (JKA) and narra- tive reason for separation (misconduct) on his discharge form DD 214; to upgrade his reenlist- ment code from RE-4 (ineligible) to RE-1 eligible; and to change the date of entry on active...

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2008-081

    Original file (2008-081.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant asked that his DD 214 be corrected to show that he is entitled to “Sikorsky wings.” There is no such medal or award listed in the Medals and Awards Manual (MAM), COMDTINST M1650.25D, and the Coast Guard states that it is not an authorized military award but an award issued by a private corporation. Therefore, because the WINONA received a “Military Readiness Award” during Refresher Training in November 1967, while the applicant was a member of the crew, the Board finds that...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2010-260

    Original file (2010-260.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her allegations, the applicant submitted a copy of a Coast Guard Reserve identification card, which was issued to her on August 19, 2004, and which shows that she was a PO2 (petty officer, second class) in pay grade E-5. An application to the Board must be filed within three years after the applicant discovers, or reasonably should have discovered, the alleged error in her record.1 Although the applicant claimed that she discovered the alleged error in June 2010, she must have...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2007-221

    Original file (2007-221.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He asked that his narrative reason for separa- tion be changed to “honorable.” On March 27, 2003, after reviewing the record, the DRB concluded that the applicant was not suitable for service in the Coast Guard but might be able to serve in another Service under circumstances where claustrophobia is not an issue. Instead, the Medical Manual and the DSM classify such phobias as anxiety disorders or panic disorders, which are not personality disorders.9 Because the applicant was never...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2010-259

    Original file (2010-259.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. applicant qualified as a boat3 crewmember on April 29, 1980, there are no documents in his record indicating that he ever served sea duty or received sea pay.4 Upon his discharge on November 26, 1980, the applicant signed his DD 214, showing zero sea service, as well as an Administrative Remarks page noting that he had “completed 00 years, 00...